I think up science fiction ideas all the time and write about some of them. Today, I decided to consider the impact of artificial intelligence on jobs.
Some of my ancestors came to America in the 1800’s to homestead (farm) in North Dakota and Minnesota. Back then, farming was one important way that immigrants could make — or eke out — a living. There were other jobs, but because of the opportunity it provided for earning and owning land, the Homestead Act of 1862 “has been called one of the most important pieces of Legislation in the history of the United States.”
Today, high technology is synonymous with not only making a living, but also often with making a very good living. Unfortunately, that opportunity may not extend to all parts of America. Take a look at the map in a recent article in MIT Technology Review entitled “In These Small Cities, AI Advances Could Be Costly.” The Rapid City, SD area is expected to experience more serious job impacts from artificial intelligence advances than most or all major cities in the U.S. It doesn’t seem right that the region that is home to Mount Rushmore, an icon of American leadership and ideals, may not benefit well from advances in high technology.
Perhaps homesteading offers a bit of direction to a solution. South Dakota’s office of economic development already has a REDI Fund Loan designed to promote job growth — particularly high tech — in the state. Over the past decade, articles have been written about small town outsourcing — competing with overseas outsourcing in some cases. Huge cloud centers (of servers) opened in small town areas are apparently not the answer, because they might only create 50 jobs — and how many of those can be replaced with AI in the future?
But why can’t technology companies, and even the federal government, get more involved in bringing job growth to places like Rapid City, South Dakota that can withstand the onslaught of AI innovation? A sort of modern day hometeching version — maybe even an Act of Congress — of homesteading.
Just looking at the map in MIT Technology Review, it is obvious that there could be job haves and have-nots in the future if nothing is done. That doesn’t bode well for the future of small town America politics versus big city America politics, and that can’t be good for anyone.