Since the definition of nation usually includes that the people inhabit a country or territory, the satellite is unlikely to suffice as either a country or territory. So, at least for now, Asgardia is only a nation-want-to-be.
Nevertheless, Asgardia represents the beginning of space colonization. In their concept of humans occupying space, the people of Asgardia might not refer to this as colonization, since some may mistake that term for meaning competition. But with costs to build and launch femto-satellites in the few thousands of dollars, this is likely to be just the beginning of hundreds if not thousands of other groups launching into space.
SYFY’s “The Expanse” is just one sci-fi depiction of what might happen when governments, mega-companies, and others go out into space and compete with money and power. Asgardia has a more peaceful vision for that future. I have yet to write a space opera or even a short story directly involving competition in space, but my stories involving space mining — “You Can Choose Your Parents” and “Remorse over Enceladus” and “A Comic on Phobos” — are somewhat related to the topic.
I’ll have to give some thought as to where I think this — nations in space, etc — is all headed. I didn’t achieve my goal of writing new stories this year, but I did make games and write and blog. I have many story ideas outlined in my files, so I’m ready to go. New stories are high on my list of things to do for 2018. I’m excited. Stay tuned!
Why the crazy title? You may have seen the 1969 film “They Shoot Horses, Don’t They?” It’s about people struggling with a variety of human frailties competing in a grueling 1930’s dance marathon. If you haven’t seen it, believe me it’s not a feel-good film. But my point here with “Turtles Shoot, Don’t They” is that when a turtle can be mistaken for a rifle, the results can be equally devastating.
Artificial intelligence and machine vision have come a long ways, however this technology is going into cars that not only aid us, but may soon drive us through town or on high speed highways. We’d like to have the security of knowing that they can see and identify objects on or next to the road as well — or better than — as we humans can. So it’s disconcerting that Google’s AI thinks a turtle is a gun, or a cat — which might be running in front of a car — is guacamole.
Researchers are just as busy creating adversarial images — images that can fool an AI — as they are figuring out how to properly categorize such images. Recently published, “One pixel attack for fooling deep neural networks” explains how little it takes sometimes to fool an AI.
I hope that AI scientists can fix these issues. I also want them to figure out why an AI can’t understand that a turtle is just a turtle. After all, even a young child would probably know that the photo shown in the research is a turtle, not a gun. What is going on in a child’s image recognition ability that isn’t going on in an AI?
I think up science fiction ideas all the time and write about some of them. Today, I decided to consider the impact of artificial intelligence on jobs.
Some of my ancestors came to America in the 1800’s to homestead (farm) in North Dakota and Minnesota. Back then, farming was one important way that immigrants could make — or eke out — a living. There were other jobs, but because of the opportunity it provided for earning and owning land, the Homestead Act of 1862 “has been called one of the most important pieces of Legislation in the history of the United States.”
Today, high technology is synonymous with not only making a living, but also often with making a very good living. Unfortunately, that opportunity may not extend to all parts of America. Take a look at the map in a recent article in MIT Technology Review entitled “In These Small Cities, AI Advances Could Be Costly.” The Rapid City, SD area is expected to experience more serious job impacts from artificial intelligence advances than most or all major cities in the U.S. It doesn’t seem right that the region that is home to Mount Rushmore, an icon of American leadership and ideals, may not benefit well from advances in high technology.
Perhaps homesteading offers a bit of direction to a solution. South Dakota’s office of economic development already has a REDI Fund Loan designed to promote job growth — particularly high tech — in the state. Over the past decade, articles have been written about small town outsourcing — competing with overseas outsourcing in some cases. Huge cloud centers (of servers) opened in small town areas are apparently not the answer, because they might only create 50 jobs — and how many of those can be replaced with AI in the future?
But why can’t technology companies, and even the federal government, get more involved in bringing job growth to places like Rapid City, South Dakota that can withstand the onslaught of AI innovation? A sort of modern day hometeching version — maybe even an Act of Congress — of homesteading.
Just looking at the map in MIT Technology Review, it is obvious that there could be job haves and have-nots in the future if nothing is done. That doesn’t bode well for the future of small town America politics versus big city America politics, and that can’t be good for anyone.
Author, Game Designer, Programmer, Tutor, Genealogist